|
Increase access to health care for children and youth. · Create more developmentally appropriate, high-quality, subsidized child care services. · Encourage service to, with, and by youth · Make youth work-force ready. · Establish secure neighborhood sites for youth and families, and safe passage. · Conduct a public education campaign to highlight positive messages about children and youth · Track progress on these initiatives. |
(More information on the Long Term Family Self-Sufficiency Plan is available at the Los Angeles Department of Public Social Services website at www.co.la.ca.us/dpss.
In response to enactment of California’s welfare
reform law (CalWORKs) in 199?, Los Angeles County took the
opportunity to re-examine their entire human services system, and develop a
plan to create a new, integrated system. Los Angeles County
wanted a new system which would:
|
·
Focus on positive outcomes. ·
Provide services to families as a unit, and ·
Strengthen communities |
The Board of Supervisors instructed the “New Directions Task Force,” chaired by the Director of the Department of Public Social Services and composed of the county's Chief Administrative Officer, the Superintendent of the County Office of Education, and directors of the county’s 12 human services department, to develop a five-year Long-Term Family Self-Sufficiency Plan for CalWORKs and working poor populations, with strategies to “stabilize families by building their capacity to become self-sustaining.”
The plan was to be structured around the five county-wide outcome areas, considered by the Board to be critical aspects of family self-sufficiency: good health, safety and survival, economic well-being, education and workforce readiness, and social and emotional well-being. The Task Force identified indicators for each outcome area to guide future planning and program decisions, reflect various aspects of long-term family self-sufficiency, and be measurable through currently available or readily generated data. (See pages 13-14 of the Long Term Family Self-Sufficiency Plan) In many cases, the indicators were already included in the Children’s Score Card. Data are disaggregated by race and primary language, and sorted geographically by countywide, Service Planning Area, supervisorial district and community. To the extent possible, the data will be collected for current and former TANF participants, as well as the general population.
Between July and September 1999, five workgroups appointed by the New Directions Task force, composed of representatives of county agencies, service providers, schools, cities, advocates and researchers, were charged with identifying projects and services that could “turn the curve” on the indicators. Each project was required to addresses a clearly documented need; have an adequate evaluation design; not duplicate existing services; be culturally and linguistically sensitive; and not supplant other funding. Desirable project elements included promoting service integration, proven effectiveness, positive long-term impacts, cost effectiveness, and community-level services provision.
Recommendations from the workgroups were synthesized into 59 proposals by county and community representatives. Forty-six combined projects, grouped in eight overarching strategies, were adopted by the Board of Supervisors in November, 1999. All projects are scheduled to be fully implemented within five years. Strategies include: See pages 16 and 92-93 of the Plan.
|
The projects range from welfare-to-work strategies and mini-career centers to services for parenting emancipated foster youth, public library services, support groups for parents of teens on probation, health care transportation and emergency assistance to prevent eviction.
(This information is summarized from the Children and Families 2001-2004 Strategic Plan. For more in-depth information, visit their website at www.prop10.org .)
The
five countywide outcome areas also undergird the Vision and long-term outcomes
of the Children and Families Commission, an independent public-private body
established by California’s Proposition 10 to improve the health, wellbeing
and school readiness of children
0-5 and their families. This
commission will receive approximately $165 million each year from increased
tobacco taxes to fund services in Los Angeles County.
School Readiness was designated as the Commission’s highest priority Outcome Area for fiscal years 2001-2004, in recognition that School Readiness is integrally related to, and will reflect, the other four Outcome Areas. Four indicators will be used to measure progress toward achieving Outcome Area.
The Commission plans to play an active role in Los Angeles on behalf of young children and their families:
As a community partner, the Commission will complement, build and strengthen the efforts and activities of civic leaders, parents, providers, physicians, teachers and other key players to have a greater impact on the lives of children and families;
As a trendsetter and leader, the Commission will be willing to identify, fund and replicate innovative as well as proven solutions to long-standing problems that affect children and families;
As a change agent, the Commission will help mobilize the broader community to advocate for expectant parents, young children and their families, and serve as a voice for disenfranchised members of the community that informs policy-makers and helps parents and families empower themselves;
As a convener and facilitator, the Commission will bring together from various sectors individuals, agencies and organizations with common goals,
As a catalyst, the Commission will promote the sustainability of effective programs for young children and their families.
Web Links: www.childpc.org or www.childrensplanningcouncil.org (to be on-line spring 2001.), www.unitedwayla.org and www.prop10.org
Executive
Director
Los
Angeles County Children’s Planning Council
500 West Temple Street, Rm. B-26
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 893-0421; Fax (213) 680-1415
Resources : (All available from the Los Angeles Children’s Planning Council or United Way of Greater Los Angeles, 523 West Sixth Street Los Angeles, CA 90014 213/630-2100)
|
Case Study Author: Lynn DeLapp |
